"My name is Bond. Dentin Bond."
Ahhh, might-have-beens. But I suppose "James" was a pretty good choice for 007's given name too...
The best dental restorations today are adhesive restorations; they're bonded onto or into the teeth that they help repair and maintain. Like all technologies, dental adhesion is in a constant state of change and improvements are being made all the time. Let's look at this vital aspect of modern dentistry and share a little insight into how the best restorations are currently achieved.
There are two fundamental parts of a tooth that we have to consider when we set out to bond to them: the enamel, and the dentin.
When we bond to enamel, we apply and then rinse away a 37% phosphoric acid solution. No worries, your stomach is more acidic than this. The solution etches the surface of the enamel, which is a substance made up of crystals. Highly magnified, it looks like this afterwards:
The surface becomes rough on a very small scale. We then apply a resin (the first part of these composite resin fillings of ours) that becomes micromechanically interlocked into the roughened surface. The strength of this bond is incredible. We can bond composite resin onto teeth in very functional areas and it often stays on for years without breaking or staining. We measure bond strengths in MegaPascals or MPa, and 30 is a very good number to achieve. (Don't worry about exactly what a MegaPascal is; all we need to do for the purposes of this discussion is to look at relative numbers.) We need to hit at least 17 MPa to keep restorations sealed and on the tooth.
The first person to achieve this breakthrough was Michael Buonocore D.D.S., in 1955.
Bonding to dentin, though- that was a lot more difficult. After removing decay with a drill there is a smear layer (yes, that's really its scientific name) of microscopic debris left all over the inside of the cavity prep. This is removed with the etchant. There are also tubules which are normal channels that run through the dentin:
According to the brilliant David Pashley:
"The success of bonding resins to acid-etched enamel is because of the fact that enamel contains little protein, and it can be dried without causing any collapse of the roughened surface. When Buonocore et al tried those same procedures on dentin, they were disappointed to find that the resin-dentin bond strengths to acid-etched dentin were very low (5 to 10 MPa) and were about the same as resin-dentin bonds made to smear layer-covered dentin. They did not know that acid-etching dentin transformed the surface from a hard, mineralized surface to a very soft, mineral-free, collagen-rich surface that collapses when air-dried. Although it is now known that acid-etching removes the smear layer and smear plugs, thereby making the tubules available for resin tag formation, drying the surface collapses the spaghetti-like collagen fibrils, making resin infiltration difficult."
Spaghetti. Spaghetti is the key to understanding all of this. Because once we've etched and rinsed the dentin, it looks like this:
The problem is, we can't leave the dentin soaked, or worse yet, underwater. We have to dry it. (And dentists, being as a class a somewhat compulsive lot, really tend to dry the teeth we work on, with a blast of air that the wind tunnel at NASA's Langley Research Center would be jealous of.) Un-etched dentin has a compressive strength of 20,000 MegaPascals. Etched dentin has a compressive strength of one MegaPascal. Just one. So here we create this wonderful substance to bond to- the dentin has this spaghetti-like mass of collagen which is highly chemically reactive and has a vast surface area- and what do we do to it? We blast it down into a flat lifeless mass, like pizza dough that's been flattened and pulverized and all dried out. The bond fails every time. The stress in the filling material as it cures (usually with a light activation procedure) is higher than the bond to the dentin, and so gaps form. Bond strength is terribly low. Teeth are sensitive. Painful to chew on because they're not bonded, the fillings actually move about when we bite. Cavities recur more easily. The left in this picture is collapsed, the right is properly expanded; in reality it can be far worse than the image indicates:
It's a disaster, and all because the pasta wasn't respected.
What, then, can we do? Well, in 1985 or so, two independent researchers solved this technical problem of dentin bonding with an innovation called self-etching primers. These researchers were Takeo Fusayama and John Gwinnett:
These researchers developed the class of dental bonding agents called self-etching primers. These primers etch and bond all in the first application of liquid, and they take a novel approach- they enlist the smear layer into the bond itself. They churn it up and make a hybrid layer out of it, a layer that is composed of the resin from the filling and also the debris from the smear layer, all activated and mixed into the spaghetti-like mass of etched dentin. This technique can now get into the 32MPa range on dentin, and also treats the enamel properly to get an enamel bond as well. It looks like this:
This technique is so excellent that, since adopting it some 12 or 14 years ago, I can say that I have never had a restoration fail from leakage and lack of bonding in its own right- they may fail from fracture, or decay around the restoration, but I do not see recurrent decay under the restoration primarily; it has to start externally, due to the patient overdoing the sugar and underdoing the flossing.
We still use etch-and-bond separately for front teeth and situations where the enamel bond is the most important factor, like chipped front teeth. This method still gives higher enamel bonds. We bias the relative bond strength between enamel and dentin to the clinical situation. There are also one-bottle self-etch primers now which I suppose are being made to "simplify" the procedure; however for various technical reasons, in late 2010 these products do not get good results at all. In fact there are only two existing self-etch products (both two-bottle) that I'd even consider using to restore a back tooth with a bonded composite resin restoration- Kuraray's SE Bond and Danville Engineering's Prelude SE. They are so superior to any others that they are the only choice in 2010, and there's a lot of science to back it up.
The longevity of these restorations is quite good as well. Silver amalgam restorations seal against the tooth by corroding, a process that reaches its peak at the two year point. After that it's all downhill. Composite resins bonded with self-etch primers seem to hold their bond strength to both enamel and dentin for at least 8-12 years, after a small initial decrease. Their longevity may be quite longer.
For the technically minded in the audience- ok, for geeks like me- here are two of my source articles; they are excellent reviews of the literature and the progress in this vital aspect of dentistry:
http://www.dentistrytoday.com/materials/1483.html
http://www.compendiumlive.com/article.php?id=2451
The reason for this rather technical review? If you have a composite resin restoration placed and it's very sensitive, especially to cold and to chewing on it, there are three main possible causes:
-The bite is "high" and needs to be adjusted;
-The decay was deep and a root canal issue is brewing; or
-Total etch was employed and the bond is not good. I'm sticking my neck out when I say this, but the science tells us that total etch is too technique sensitive to rely upon, and thus self-etch is the only rational way to restore a back tooth with composite resin at the present time.
"and all because the pasta wasn't respected."
Posted by: Dorothy Shapland | November 20, 2010 at 03:15 PM
MegaPascals, smear layers, resin infiltration—say, isn't this the language that those derivatives traders used in their labyrinthine passages into the subprime depths? This isn't a hidden message to Bear Sterns is it? But you did mention pizza, which exonerates you from blame.
Thanks for another toothsome post, Dentin Bond.
Posted by: Tom Bentley | November 23, 2010 at 11:14 AM
It's a very interesting article to read. I really enjoy reading your post all about dental bonding. The pictures also help me understand well the article. Thanks for all your ideas and great thanks for sharing it.
Posted by: dental bonding bellevue WA | April 01, 2011 at 09:18 AM
W.W., yes veneers, being made of very nonporous porcelain, will protect the dentin inside of teeth from acidity, which comes from the simple sugars we ingest. The bacteria in our mouths metabolize sugars and kick out a lot of acid. There are also many chemicals that directly affect teeth, such as the phosphoric acid in soda. Still, one's own enamel is probably the very best protection.
As long as it's intact, that is.
Posted by: Rick Wilson DMD | April 01, 2011 at 10:25 PM
Thanks for posting this. It was a well thought out article and interesting to read.
Posted by: S-Bond | April 28, 2011 at 04:08 PM
Didn't realize that veneers had the ability to protect tooth dentin.
Posted by: Teeth Whitening In Atlanta | September 28, 2011 at 05:24 PM
I have some dental issues that maybe you can address? I am a 40 yr old woman and in relitively good health. But my teeth seem to be falling apart. I had some xrays done of the front of my teeth because of a particular cavity that is at the gum line. To begin with it was quite small but the dentist showed me the x-rays and I could see what he said was decay all the way to the pulp chamber and that I would need a root canal. But in the pic it looks like someone shoved the head of a pin in the tiny cavity and burrowed to the pulp no wider than a stick pin itself. He asked me if I was hurting from it and the answer was no. No pain whatsoever. He said that eventually I would have pain but somethiing else happened instead and now it has happened to another tooth on the bottom. What actually happened was that the whole shell of the enamel came free of the tooth exposing the dentin completely, front and back. Again, neither of these teeth cause me any pain but I realize that the dentin material is pliable and soft so I am careful not to be to rough with them. Whats hapening to me and can I have them capped in order to save them w/o the pain and expense of a root canal?
Posted by: Anna Hasker | October 21, 2011 at 02:58 PM
Anna, while I can only answer in generalities without examining you in person and seeing Xrays, you can email me at [email protected] (in my contact info too).
The pin-like structure may have been a restorative pin, used to hold large restorations in at times. More here:
http://www.identalhub.com/dental-what-are-pins-and-posts-in-dentistry-757.aspx
You mostly have top guard against more decay and let your dentist handle the restorations; it sounds like you and he are communicating well and that everything makes sense. To help prevent cavities have a look at our Caries Clock:
http://www.smilephiladelphian.com/clock/Caries.php
Posted by: Rick Wilson DMD | October 24, 2011 at 04:08 PM
Excellent post!
Only one thing I do not agree with you: last paragraph....as you mention before in the text..GREAT Dr. David Pashley won´t agree with you. If you appreciate Dentin you need: Acid + MMP inhibition + Primer + Bonding....every step is needed.
Personal opinion: it is not an excuse...doing it worst because it is difficult...
Apart from this, your post is an excellent revision of adhesive dentistry. Nice and usefull picts.
Pashley D, Tay F, et al. State of the art of etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dental Materials 2011; 27: 1-16.
Posted by: Simon | June 13, 2012 at 07:00 AM